Kelpak again

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Stone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
5,450
Reaction score
254
Location
Victoria Australia
I just purchased 5lt of kelpak.
No doubt they have been answered elswere but A few questions.
How long is this material stable for?
Should it be stored in the fridge?
What is the best dilution for paphs/orchids? ml per Litre?
And any other information you would care to add:drool::D
(eg) Will it make me feel warmer if I drink it......Its $#$@*&ing FREEZING!!!
 
I keep it in the fridge and shake the bottle a bit every time I use it. Apparently it has preservatives to give it a one year shelf life at room temperature, but why risk it?

I have a 1 L bottle with a 7.5 ml cap, so 1 capful goes into 2 L of water, once every two weeks.
 
Personally I think 7.5ml in 2 litres might be a tad too strong. That's approximately 1 TBS/ gal. The manufacturer recommends no more frequently than once every two to three weeks so I stretch it to once a month to be safe and use 1 tsp. (5ml.)/gal. I make sure to foliar feed with it at the same time.

I store mine in the fridge and believe the shelf life is much more than one year.

I recall Rick uses 1/4 tsp. (1.25ml.)/gal. once a week when he fertilizes.
 
Anything below normal body temperature is considered cold, anything below 20 Celsius is of course 'freezing' even though water freezes at 0 Celsius, no self respecting colonial considers him or herself to be water!
 
It does not have to be refrigerated. Cool and dark is sufficient

"At least 2 years" is the quoted shelf life.

I use the stuff at 256:1 about monthly.


Ray Barkalow (via Tapatalk)
 
It does not have to be refrigerated. Cool and dark is sufficient

"At least 2 years" is the quoted shelf life.

I use the stuff at 256:1 about monthly.


Ray Barkalow (via Tapatalk)

Thanks ray but wouldn't 257:1 be better;)
 
Personally I think 7.5ml in 2 litres might be a tad too strong. That's approximately 1 TBS/ gal. The manufacturer recommends no more frequently than once every two to three weeks so I stretch it to once a month to be safe and use 1 tsp. (5ml.)/gal. I make sure to foliar feed with it at the same time.

I store mine in the fridge and believe the shelf life is much more than one year.

I recall Rick uses 1/4 tsp. (1.25ml.)/gal. once a week when he fertilizes.

I'm just curious, why do you want to foliar feed KelpMax? Both auxin and cytokinin "generally" have different effects on shoot vs root tissue systems. For example, auxin promotes cell elongation in shoot, but suppress elongation in root during the gravitropism. Or auxin promotes formation of lateral roots, but prevent shoot branching (apical dominance). With regard to the branching, the effects of cytokinin is the opposite of auxin. I'm not sure how this applies to sympodium monocots, but I have always thought that I need to apply KelpMax to the roots.
 
:rollhappy::rollhappy: Just 14ºC last night at the place where all swedish tourist come to see the sun and the beach, rain during the night and just one cloud outside - no sun at all. The paphs are defenitly growing slow this 'summer'!
And yes, I've no Kelpak over here but the algae-fertilizers I always apply at the substrate/roots.
 
Thanks ray but wouldn't 257:1 be better;)

256 is just convenient -a tablespoon per gallon.

To Naoki's question about foliar versus root application - my own experience is dousing the daylights out of the entire plant, so I cannot say if it is absorbed through the leaves in the first place. I also don't know if such hormone treatments are a "whole body" thing, or if they only affect the point of application.

I can say that the application of the auxins (Kelpak/KelpMax is roughly 350:1 auxin to cytokinin), the first reaction is that of significant root tip growth, and as they do, they natually emit cytokinis that lead to cell elongation and growth.

I have focused on the chemical as a root growth stimulant, but I suppose, with proper study, it could be a flower size/conformation factor, as well. The US importer owns a winery, and he uses the stuff on the grape vines immediately after fruit-set. It causes the elongation of the rachis, allowing fruit development without interference from adjacent grapes, and creates more room for penetration of fungicides. He, therefore, gets much better yields of better fruit.
 
Poor guy! Here it was down to 4.4 last night and this is SUMMER!:rollhappy:

Yeah these guys are spoiled! We get -45c here in the middle of winter. Yes that is not a typo. We go to our freezer to warm up.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top