Sue
evil genius
Got this in trade this summer from our own Tenman.
Paph. Arthur = venustum x philippinense. This one is labeled (roebelenii album 'Greenlace' x venustum album). I'm obviously a bit skeptical that both parents were true albinistic plants—either it got mislabeled, or one or the other only appeared albinistic, but was really a semi-alba. I don't mind—I'm just glad that it's so obviously actually an Arthur! (Tennis, if you think it might be something else, please let me know . . . )
Paph. Arthur is a cross first made in 1890, and one which I have never seen a picture or plant of. But it sure looks like what you'd expect from (venustum x philippinense), doesn't it?
I took pictures in bright shade and in direct sun. True color is somewhere in between these pics. If you'd like detail, or to see the staminodes, from the Flickr pages, click on 'All Sizes' to get nice hi-res images.
Paph. Arthur = venustum x philippinense. This one is labeled (roebelenii album 'Greenlace' x venustum album). I'm obviously a bit skeptical that both parents were true albinistic plants—either it got mislabeled, or one or the other only appeared albinistic, but was really a semi-alba. I don't mind—I'm just glad that it's so obviously actually an Arthur! (Tennis, if you think it might be something else, please let me know . . . )
Paph. Arthur is a cross first made in 1890, and one which I have never seen a picture or plant of. But it sure looks like what you'd expect from (venustum x philippinense), doesn't it?
I took pictures in bright shade and in direct sun. True color is somewhere in between these pics. If you'd like detail, or to see the staminodes, from the Flickr pages, click on 'All Sizes' to get nice hi-res images.