Long before it bloomed, I knew it had the wrong tag. Upon contacting the grower I bought it from, we thought it was most likely glaucophyllum, based on what other plants were in the grower's greenhouse. Any comments as to whether this is correct?
Looks like glaucophyllum. But, did you shine the leaves?....because they don't look very glaucous.
Looks like glaucophyllum. But, did you shine the leaves?....because they don't look very glaucous.
Probably.The leaves are not really shiney. It just must be an effect of the diffuse natural light when I was photographing it.
..I'm sure Sanderianum will chime in and say we're all idiots and he knows the person with the only real glauco and they killed that plant before they ever took pictures, bred with it, or shared a division or pollen, and it's now lost to the hobby though.
-Ernie
Looks like glaucophyllum. What does the bottom of the staminode look like??
Interesting.... it actually looks quite smaller in the picture (I know there is no reference point in the picture, but it's the impression I get)The plant's leaf span is about 12 inches, which is larger than my other glaucophyllum, but smaller than the moquettianums I had.
Ernie, the strong marked leaves of P. liemianum are visible in this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paphiopedilum_liemianum.jpg. But these mottled leaves are no distinctive feature of liemianum. Most P. liemianum I've seen here in Germany have plain dark green leaves and no mottled ones....At first glance, the light dorsal halo whispers liemianum, but that species has very strongly marked leaves we don't see here....
:rollhappy: :rollhappy: :rollhappy:...I'm sure Sanderianum will chime in and say we're all idiots and he knows the person with the only real glauco and they killed that plant before they ever took pictures, pressed a flower, bred with it, or shared a division or pollen, and it's now lost to the hobby though. -Ernie