Roth was Kingkong. I need to get name for the stonei used. Kingkong was supposed to be huge, 7.2 DS.That's an incredible clone. The sepals look enormous. What is the cross? I also have a Lady Isobel flask from Sam I am growing out.
Roth was Kingkong. I need to get name for the stonei used. Kingkong was supposed to be huge, 7.2 DS.
The issue of spelling of the Lady goes on forever. She was registered as Lady Isobel is 1897 but we want her to be Isabel.
It does have more influence from stonei on the pouch and the roth used has influenced the size of the dorsal.It is often difficult to evaluate from images posted. But as is often the case, it may be the only thing we can do for the moment. But with such a huge dorsal on what is obviously a gorgeous flower, in a few of gego’s pictures, am I seeing an undersized pouch? It appears at times to be out of proportion with that huge dorsal.
Bigger is often not automatically better. I would need to see it face to face. Well face to pouch I guess.
I thought it was the opposite. Mistakenly registered as Isabel but the daughter it was named after was Isobel. So it has been now corrected.
Thanks for correcting me. The registered name, Isobel, is now also the right one. I don’t think all the tags out there and pictures and flasks in progress will quickly get fixed so the name confusion will continue to some extent.I am with you emydura. It was very nicely documented in this linked article below - all credits to Nick from. “Sweetgum and Pines”
I hope he does not mind me sharing his article.
Paphiopedilum Lady Isobel: hybrid history
We can only wish. Maybe cross this with a nice anitum or a Hsinying Anita.Amazing presentation, great dorsal and nice wide petals! My only wish, and this might be nitpicking, is that the pouch color were a little more intense, maybe some cooler nights could help with that?
Enter your email address to join: