Paph Susan Booth

[thelink]

After a few years of growing, it finally bloomed! I am satisfied with the result!

 

[Wendy]

Lovely! The colour is extrordinary!

 

[fbrem]

very nice one there

 

[biothanasis]

Lovely!!!

 

[toddybear]

Congrats! It's lovely.

 

[John M]

Beautiful; although, I would like to see a photo that shows the staminode. This angle makes it difficult to see the form of the flower.

Also, I believe that this is Paph. William Ambler, not Susan Booth. Of course, there are a LOT of William Amblers out there mislabelled at Susan Booth because wilhelminiae used to be considered a variety of glanduliferum, not a separate species.

 

[SlipperKing]

I totally agree with John. Link are the parents listed on your tag? Beautiful flowers in a W. Ambler kind of mood!
Here is a typical Susan Booth
http://www.slippertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21082&highlight=susan+booth

 

[W. Beetus]

I would be quite satisfied with that! Very nice.

 

[SlipperFan]

Nice deep color.

 

[Ozpaph]

Please show us her face.

 

[emydura]

Nice. I like the wide dorsal.

I totally agree with John. Link are the parents listed on your tag? Beautiful flowers in a W. Ambler kind of mood!
Here is a typical Susan Booth
http://www.slippertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21082&highlight=susan+booth

To be honest I think this plant looks much closer to yours Rick than my William Ambler. To me William Ambler is a lot darker. I think this has used a dark form of praestans rather than wilhelminiae.

http://www.slippertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22921&highlight=ambler

David

 

[SlipperKing]

That or a very light wilhelminiae David!oke: Knowing the variability of that group that's why I ask if Link had the parents. Maybe he will respond soon.