phrag wallissii

[troy]

 

[MaryPientka]

I want one of these Beautiful!

 

[eteson]

Nice warszewiczianum! love the pale coloration of this one.

 

[eaborne]

Very nice!

 

[phrag guy]

nice

 

[NYEric]

Wallisii!? Are trying to get a battle started!?

 

[SlipperFan]

Interesting sideways growth...oke:

 

[troy]

Sorry about sideways!! I took the picture upright, I was having serious posting problems with tapatalk

 

[cnycharles]

they won't even allow picture uploading with the old version of tapatalk I have

nice flowers! I like this species, though the darkest forms

 

[abax]

Oh noooo, it's growing sideways! Even sideways, it's quite
nice.

 

[Jenn4a]

I love the long petaled phrags! Nice phrag!

Wallisii!? Are trying to get a battle started!?

The name changes and slight differences in spelling hurt my head.. :crazy:

How come you haven't corrected me when I've posted about my phrag schlimii x wallisii and my new phrag Chuck Acker (Eric Young x wallisii). :rollhappy: .. Oops. Maybe I shouldn't have said anything.

 

[Rick]

Oh noooo, it's growing sideways! Even sideways, it's quite
nice.

That's the natural way they grow on the side of cliffsoke:oke:

They do look very nice

 

[Rick]

The name changes and slight differences in spelling hurt my head.. :crazy:

Just type in a random string of w's, c's, z's and y's, (just no vowels) and we'll know what your talking about:sob:

 

[troy]

Tag says wallisii I also have a caudatum and a warsciwizianum 3 plants all different tags, some day they will all bloom, I am going to compare the huge difference lol...

 

[eteson]

Troy wallisii is not correct... never was. You can change the name in the label or keep it as is but your plant should be named warszewiczianum. Probably the other one that you have labelled as warszewiczianum is the same species but it could be also popowii... if you have a picture we can indentify it.

 

[Jenn4a]

Just type in a random string of w's, c's, z's and y's, (just no vowels) and we'll know what your talking about:sob:

Ok :rollhappy: I have troubles remembering which one was/is warscewiczianum and warszewiczianum off the top of my head. When I forget, I just look at this to refresh my memory. http://phragweb.slipperaceae.info/phragmipedium/genus/sections/phragmipedium.asp

 

[troy]

First thing, why is " wallisii" never correct? My tag says wallisii "pathfinder" the name would have never come to be if was never right? My caudatum "windy hill" and warsciwiscizianum with also a majestic tresses from marilyn ledoux is on it's way. I am going to bloom these and compare

 

[Jenn4a]

The link I posted says that the name changed from caudatum var. wallisii to wallisii in 1993, to wallisii in 1998, to caudatum var. wallisii in 2003, and then to warszewicsianum in 2004.

*I have no idea if it's correct, but it's what I've been using to help me with the names of popowii and warszewiczianum.

 

[eteson]

wallisii and warzewiczianum are synonims but warzewiczianum was published first so wallisii is not valid. Some people do not care about nomenclature so do not trust 100% in what labels says.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...atum_Phrag._warszewiczianum_Phrag._humboldtii

 

[SlipperFan]

wallisii and warzewiczianum are synonims but warzewiczianum was published first so wallisii is not valid. Some people do not care about nomenclature so do not trust 100% in what labels says.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...atum_Phrag._warszewiczianum_Phrag._humboldtii

And the caudatum group is one of the most contested...