A few cattleya blooms

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Messages
1,741
Reaction score
1,383
Location
Spotsylvania, VA
Cattleya percivaliana ‘Undine’ AM/AOS orig

IMG_4627.jpeg

Cattleya Bow Bells ‘Honolulu’ (C. Edithiae x C. Suzanne Hye) 1945 orig, tightly held so never awarded, mild sweet fragrance, first bloom for me.
IMG_4665.jpegIMG_4645.jpeg


Rlc. Mem. Grant Eichler ‘Lenette AM/AOS orig
(Rlc. James Hausermann × Cattleya Irene Finney) 1974
IMG_4664.jpegIMG_4615.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4625.jpeg
    3.8 MB
  • IMG_4627.jpeg
    IMG_4627.jpeg
    1.5 MB
  • IMG_4624.jpeg
    3.5 MB
  • IMG_4624.jpeg
    3.5 MB
All are great, Deborah ... but I like the C. percivaliana ‘Undine’ the best.
Thanks Rudolf! This one came from Plato Matthews' collection that Waldor purchased. I bought it as a back up, because the one I purchased from Christofferson was really struggling. It was tiny "2" pot" and has taken me 2 years to get it to the point I think it will survive. This flower is much. more coerulea in person. I could not get it to photograph. Keith Davis says the blues come out better in natural light, later in the day. That's when this was taken, but still did not capture it. At other times, the flower photographed almost white. I'm working on a set up to be able to photograph inside with natural light. We shall see...
 
Last edited:
Ondine is a great clone!!!!
Istvan: Interesting cultivar. I can't find it in Orchid Wiz and don't have access to RHS. But, two have been awarded by AOS. It was given the name 'Undine' when awarded. The first was an HCC (78pts) in 1999 at a Venezuelan Orchid Show. But, it does not appear to be the same flower. When AOS awarded this one (AM 84 pts) in 2010 to Canaima it was not awarded as f. coerulea and the following description was given.

"Description​

Four exceptionally well-shaped flowers on two inflorescences; flowers uniformly light lavender-blue; dorsal sepal flat, upright; lateral sepals flat and full, fenestrations present between petals and lateral sepals; petals round, full and flat; lip slightly oblong, full, closed over column, midlobe dark orange centrally, veined dark purple, veined lighter purple under column; substance firm; texture matte; plant reputed to be parent of previously C. percivaliana f. coerulea 'Undine' HCC/AOS (19991706), if so 19991706 should be listed as product of selfing with new clonal epithet."

When I bought the first one from Steven Christoffersen in June, 2023, he described it as coerulea 'Ondine' HCC/AOS orchid plant RARE ORIG DIVISION. He gave more history. I can pull the original listing up on eBay, I can't pull up his description and failed to copy it I guess, not realizing that the listings go away in their entirety. Steven explained then that it had been misspelled upon registration of the HCC. Steven is excellent and I believe, trustworthy, in his descriptions and provenance.

In any event, it's all pretty confusing. I will contact Steven and ask him for his original description and whether he knows if his is the one that was given the AM or the HCC and if they are indeed the same plant or different. My memory is he got the plant from Ernest Hetherington. Jerry Fischer also lists his as the f. coerulea. I had seen Jerry's for a couple of years on his website (way out of my price range), which is why I remembered it and had interest when I saw Steven's listing. While expensive, it was a small fraction of Jerry's asking price. Jerry's photo looks like the AM flower on steroids. The main difference in the two on AOS is the throat and shape. Will report back if I solve the mystery of what Steven's description was. It's frustrating I can't pull up the original full description despite being able to pull up the original listing.
 
Last edited:
Really well done, Deborah and you have a first rate hybrid collection.
Thanks! After losing so many to virus early on, I decided if I could only have a small collection (about 100 plants), I'd choose carefully. At the time you could get an original for twice the price of a meristem, so with fewer plants, I could opt for some originals from reputable vendors whose provenance could be trusted. Unfortunately, that was several years ago, before COVID and now the prices are considerably higher and pretty out of reach. Every now and then you can get lucky on eBay, but I hate the bidding process.
 
Thanks! After losing so many to virus early on, I decided if I could only have a small collection (about 100 plants), I'd choose carefully. At the time you could get an original for twice the price of a meristem, so with fewer plants, I could opt for some originals from reputable vendors whose provenance could be trusted. Unfortunately, that was several years ago, before COVID and now the prices are considerably higher and pretty out of reach. Every now and then you can get lucky on eBay, but I hate the bidding process.
Another one with name confusion. I think we are stuck with ‘Undine’ since it is the cultivar name used RHS awards in 1999 and in 2010. If the 2010 was really the parent of the 1999 plant as stated in the award description, the cultivar name would need to have been different in 1999! Who knows which plants created divisions or mericlones. We are in the same boat with collection size, although I think my target will be in the 60-80 number with mature plants. I spent a few too many years exploring species when I should have been selectively looking for outstanding virus-free hybrids like you did!
 
Another one with name confusion. I think we are stuck with ‘Undine’ since it is the cultivar name used RHS awards in 1999 and in 2010. If the 2010 was really the parent of the 1999 plant as stated in the award description, the cultivar name would need to have been different in 1999! Who knows which plants created divisions or mericlones. We are in the same boat with collection size, although I think my target will be in the 60-80 number with mature plants. I spent a few too many years exploring species when I should have been selectively looking for outstanding virus-free hybrids like you did!
It was AOS that I posted the description from, not RHS. Sorry for the confusion. Yes, of course you are correct. However, it seems like AOS would rather turn over in its proverbial grave than change anything once it’s duly registered. There are cases of things awarded being disputed and going before a review board (identification committee), but in the recent cases I know of nothing changed. I know of one that clearly (by all respected old timers, who knew the cultivar) was not the clonal name presented for judging, but a suspected sibling or selfing of that clonal name. It got by the judges and was awarded. It was challenged and the ID committee upheld the award.
At least in this description for ‘Undine’, it was noted that the previous award was a different cultivar, probably an offspring. Oh, and all divisions should be given a cultivar name when divided and passed on (because they are the same plant/cultivar). I learned this recently when I gave Patrick a division of Frans Hais!) and all meristems bear the cultivar name (and awards) of the mother plant.
Having said all of this, judges are in an impossible position in some cases trying to determine if a plant coming before them is what it’s represented as. I observed an educational judging session where a lovely seedling was presented. One of the judges insisted it was Rlc. Greenwich ‘Elmhurst’ and was not going to evaluate it. He had considerable clout and was not usually questioned, so the team was about to pass over it. Until the hybridizer’s representative spoke up (it was not his entry but that of someone he’d sold the seedling to), that indeed it was a hybrid C. Mem. Fred Brush and not Greenwich ‘Elmhurst’, the plant was not going to be evaluated. It then was, and if I remember correctly was awarded.
My point is, in the relatively limited time judges have, they obviously do their best but are not perfect. I present something expecting nothing. That way, I’m never disappointed, at least not significantly 😉

There are some wonderful species, but I love floofy catts. Remember, you always have right of first refusal on anything I have. Best mentor a girl could ask for at a time when I knew nothing. I’d probably have killed everything and given up had it not been for your hours of coaching. I am grateful!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top