Anyone seen Phrag Raymond Faroult..?

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Don, the color is much better than on OSF and it is
gorgeous. I'd be keeping that beauty too! I wonder if
division at some future date plus better light might
produce more blooms.
 
Angela, that could be a possibility...

Must admit my surprise that there is so little excitement about this being shown. It is lovely, and never been seen on the web before. It would seem a shame if we let these very early crosses fade into oblivion..!
 
What's the name of the website that has a photo of a
species Phrag. and beside it there's all the crosses made
with that species? I can't find it or think of the name and
it's driving me crazier than normal. I think a photo of this
cross belongs on that site.
 
I agree; but it must not be a great blooming plant. Phrag. Calurum is old (1883) and much much more popular. :eek:

Ainsworthii is even older (1979). I have both, and prefer Ainsworthii. At least with the Calurum I have, the colour is a bit garish. Ainsworthii has the lovelier, more subtle hues akin to Raymond Faroult. I know that Calurum and Ainsworthii are supposed to be more or less the same, but they aren't to my eye, at least with the specimens I have or have seen. Calurum is brighter, a bit more pink to it.
 
Malcolm Perry told me a bit more about this specimen. I hope to get more details soon, but it seems it was rescued from a very old collection that was being sold off. He said in all his years growing and selling phrags, he has never encountered nor even heard of another specimen of this cross. So there is a challenge: has anyone heard of one of these growing in someone's collection out there somewhere? Surely this cannot be the only survivor of the breeding from decades ago that created it.
 
Yes, it could actually be a lone survivor. I was surprised when I asked a hybridizer and he said sometimes you only get a few plants from a cross, or that he had sold all and lost the one he kept for breeding!
 
Dot, it will be very very similar to this shot from 4 days ago. But I will take another shot tomorrow and post again. This shot was taken with the camera looking somewhat up at the bloom, in order to show something of the dorsal sepal's colour etc.

 
Last edited:
I think its gorgeous Dot, and thanks to you asking me to photograph it again, I noticed the dots inside the pouch - hadn't seen them earlier! That is reminiscent of kovachii. I wonder how many have spots inside?

I was wondering if anyone has a list of all the 19th century-registered crosses?
 
Back
Top