:rollhappy:
This is my point.The first one is indeed very dark, but you need to put some light into the flower because otherwise it is just a silhouette.
Close, Brian!HA!!!!! Any good photographer could reproduce these in a second. The exposure is set for the background, with back light. Dark indeed. Get the exposure right, use a light green, blue, or grey background (as one should when creating documentary images of extremely dark flowers), and expose for the middle; and you will end up seeing the greens in the second photo, and the detail in the first. HA!!!
No camera tricks here. The only thing that I know of that does not reflect light is a black hole. Even the darkest of flowers will reflect light, but it has to be a combination of light into the flower and the correct exposure to show the darkness of the flower with all it's detail. A silhouette is simply the shape of an object without the detail that describes it's texture and form.Huh? So its all a camera trick? But I think Olaf posted some similar Maudiae type x multifloras which were nearly black sometime last year...
I am so glad I'm not the only the one. Now if we can find that third person without a Facebook account we can start our own anti-Facebook club. :clap: