I've had many EYOF plants over the past 18 years. Some are more prone to the showing of these 'horns' than others. Usually they're pretty small, and don't obtrude much visually. The first bloom shown here was exceptional for the size of that horn. But for example, I haven't seen any horns at all on the EYOF specimens of St. Ouen, or Hanne Popow. Maybe schlimii being present helps? Its the medium length petals that are more prone to this, one's with longifolium in the background, in my experience. But as you can see with this 2nd bloom of Don Wimbur, that tiny horn is nothing to trouble one. I suppose the folk at EYOF have reckoned that having a few plants with horned blooms was a price worth paying in order to get the bigger blooms of 4N. And they always keep their best ones, and would sell off the ones they didn't like so much. Nowadays, for better or worse, they rarely sell any of their phrag crosses, as they are focused only on winning awards at shows. The wider orchid-growing community is no longer of any real interest to them. (By way of testament to that point, notice the lack of anyone at the EYOF ever posting any comments in this forum.) Is this a criticism? I suppose it is, but it is mainly meant as an observation of their policy change over the past 10 years or so.
I'm not aware of any other means for inducing greater occurrence of polyploidy in orchids other than the use of colchicine. Anybody..?