Paph. Fumimasa Sugiyama 'Hillsview'

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Oct 29, 2008
Messages
203
Reaction score
28
This is one of the 2 plants given to me a year or two back. Scott Ware made this cross and the registration should have been his. At any rate it is a fine thing. The color is better this year no doubt due to the never ending cool spells we have been inflicted with? Enjoy! Thank you Scott.

Paph_FumimasaSugyama_Hillsview_p.jpg
 
Wow!!!! spectacular flowers!!! great shape and colors!!! Bravo to the grower and bravo Scott!!! :clap::clap::clap: Jean
 
A BEAUTY! :clap: :drool: :clap: :drool:
What was the color like last year?
 
A BEAUTY! :clap: :drool: :clap: :drool:
What was the color like last year?

The color was very pale yellow last year. Paph. platyphylum is a very pale yellow at best and tends to yellow out its progeny. The color is deeper in this flowering and the only thing I can attribute is the cool weather. Anthocyanin levels tend to be grater at cooler temperatures.

Theresa

http://www.hillsviewgardens.com
 
I love this hybrid. It blooms reliably, is ever so much more easy to grow and bloom than either of its parents, and produces a really beautiful plant that is attractive even when out of bloom. I confess - it hogs a bit more bench space than most, and as Theresa is tired of hearing me whine, I wish it produced taller inflorescences.

My mother carefully totes several large multiple-growth plants of this hybrid in bloom for display at the styling stations and treatment rooms at her salon & spa. The flowers last for weeks even in that harsh air-conditioned environment. Who would have thought 15 years ago that hybrids of Paph. sanderianum would become as commonplace in public as Home Depot phalaenopsis?!

Did Scott register it?

I certainly tried - but it was like beating my head against a brick wall.

At the time, the powers at Kew were recognizing Paph. platyphyllum as a distinct species, and the RHS orchid registrar had already processed at least one other hybrid registration listing it as a distinct parent. That hybrid being Ratcliffe's registration of Paph. Kee Chin Lim (platyphyllum x malipoense).

I submitted the paperwork with photos more than once, and each time the RHS registrar threw it back with the admonishment that this hybrid had already been registered as Paph. Sander's Pride (sanderianum x stonei). [Essentially asserting that Paph. platyphyllum was in fact, Paph. stonei.]

I sent emails, snail mails and resubmitted the paperwork to the RHS registrar but never got a personal response other than "ALREADY REGISTERED AS SANDER'S PRIDE!!!" scribbled on my application forms before they were returned to me. It was almost as if they were saying, "Get lost and quit bothering us!"

Then, a month or two after this all began, I was in the midst of composing a new appeal and learned that Paphiopedilum (platyphyllum x sanderianum) had been successfully registered by someone else, naming the originator as "unknown".

Game Over. Oh well.

Since that time I was able to register one hybrid using Paph. platyphyllum as a distinct species parent [Paph. Poulsbo Canary (platyphyllum x armeniacum)], but I haven't tried recently (and I've made LOTS of Paph. platyphyllum hybrids!) and based on what I see in OrchidWiz when I look up Paph. platyphyllum and its F1 Offspring, I'm not sure such an application would be accepted now.

SW
 
Scott, if you still have all that old paperwork, why not make copies and send them back to RHS with the question, "Why didn't you accept my application?"
 
Back
Top