SlipperFan
Addicted
I got the plant from Ratcliffe. Maybe I should contact Paul Phillips and see if he still agrees that it is philippinense.
I'm putting it in the Saginaw Valley OS show this weekend. It will be interesting if the Judges have anything to say about it.Very nice Dot.
Given none of the main Paph taxonomists recognise laevegatum, it's a phillipinense from a scientific point of view. But then I know that most Paph growers are splitters and hence won't accept this.
The petals are a lot redder than my laevagatum form (which is in high bud at the moment). But like mine, the plant is small and compact and the spike is short. So I'd say yes. But it is still a phillipinense.
David