Thank you, David. It's actually more whitish, seen with the naked eye. The slight purplishness of the petals, that shows itself so clearly in the photos, is, I suppose, a testimony to its complex background.Wow Jens that’s wonderful! A nice white paph that’s a good grower is worth its weight in gold!
Neither am I, but I also tend to like this one.I'm not normally a fan of complex hybrids...
Thank you for your input, Rau. I'm not at all familiar with the world of complex hybrids, so your info is valued.She is beautiful!
However, I am not sure if this is really the White Lady. She looks more like Mrs. White (Krull's Gacier; Paphiopedilum Ice Age × Paphiopedilum Icy Icy Wind).
The White Lady is significantly more open, the petals are narrower, the shoe is significantly larger and never spotted, overall it looks more elegant with about the same size.
The White Lady looks more feminine while the Mrs. White is square.
Here are some photos. The White Lady is always on the left and Krulls Glacier (Mrs. White) on the right.
View attachment 37301View attachment 37302View attachment 37300
"Grooming"...sounds dangerously on the shadier side of the law!with a bit of grooming that could be very nice
Convergent evolution. The breeders have been breeding for the same thing: white, round flowers with little pigmentation and spotting. Overlap is to be expected. Hi similarity between individuals of different grexes among Maudiae type hybrids would be no surprise, we just expect complex Paphs to be all over the place with respect to variation within a grex.It is striking, however, that both the White Lady and Mrs. White are so similar, both at exhibitions and in the trade, as if they were industrially manufactured.
Enter your email address to join: