Went on a wildflower hike here in Colorado this past weekend and found a few colonies of Cyp parviflorum. Just love them.
Last edited:
parviflorum in the mountains
- Thread starter My Green Pets
- Start date
Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:
You are quite lucky to have found them. Keep the location hidden please.
KyushuCalanthe
Just call me Tom
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 8,280
- Reaction score
- 584
Fantastic! And to Angela's point, remembering to cull out the EXIF data on your photos before submitting them protects your information as well as the location (which you did).
Beautiful to see them growing in their natural habitat. 
So far I've seen C. parviflorum solely in flower pots or gardens namely in an artificial surroundings.
So far I've seen C. parviflorum solely in flower pots or gardens namely in an artificial surroundings.
My phone had 0 signal where we were. I couldn't have recorded location data even if i had wanted to 
The holy grail to me would be Cyp kentuckiense.
The holy grail to me would be Cyp kentuckiense.
Is Cyp kentuckiensis found that far north?
Nice! Are they the pubescens ‘variety’? (I call the usual ones)
tnyr5
Well-Known Member
Very pretty. I saw them by the hundreds a few weeks ago at... a place.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
- Messages
- 298
- Reaction score
- 239
Go to North east Texas. They have been reported there.My phone had 0 signal where we were. I couldn't have recorded location data even if i had wanted to
The holy grail to me would be Cyp kentuckiense.
KyushuCalanthe
Just call me Tom
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 8,280
- Reaction score
- 584
Your plants would fall into the concept of pubescens, at least to my eyes. That said, the delineation of this species into the more or less accepted varieties, v. parviflorum, v. pubescens, and v. makasin, are based largely on plants from populations east of the Mississippi River. Plants in the western US and far north don't always fall into those categories easily, and indeed even many eastern plants seem to be intermediate forms.
If you want to see kentuckiense I'd contact someone who knows a population and is willing to take you to it. They are rare as hen's teeth, even in the heart of the species' distribution in and around the state of Arkansas. I've only seen cultivated plants, but they are something to see in person.
If you want to see kentuckiense I'd contact someone who knows a population and is willing to take you to it. They are rare as hen's teeth, even in the heart of the species' distribution in and around the state of Arkansas. I've only seen cultivated plants, but they are something to see in person.
I know where some kentuckiense are growing, but it's hell getting to the area and the
place is well protected.
place is well protected.
Charles are these kentuckiense that you saw and photographed? I'm guessing you were not in new jersey!
KyushuCalanthe
Just call me Tom
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 8,280
- Reaction score
- 584
Lovely photos Charles. Neat to see the yellow form. Is this population uniformly yellow lipped, or is there a range of colors? I look forward to your video.
If you asked this population where it was from they'd definitely reply with "y'all" rather than "yous guys"
If you asked this population where it was from they'd definitely reply with "y'all" rather than "yous guys"
Great photos... beautifull flowers, thanks for sharing!
Yes, and no. …Tom is correct!
Tom, there were a few that were mostly yellow, but most of them had a green background tint to them. If they look greenish in the pic, they were green tinted in life
Zach is the caretaker of the state where these are, would need to contact him about location access. I think his last name is Bradford but can’t remember. It’s far from Colorado though
tnyr5
Well-Known Member
" OH OH! We knows! We knows where that is!" *slap* Quiet, Igor.
KyushuCalanthe
Just call me Tom
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 8,280
- Reaction score
- 584
Thanks. If memory serves, this population was found to have alleles that are also present in C. parviflorum, suggesting there was introgression between the 2 species at some point. Given that gene viability is low in this species, it is unique to have this extra variation, something western populations lack. I wonder if the plants at the Georgia site have the same variation, or if that is unique to this population. Certainly this species was once more abundant across its range in the distant past given the current disjunctive populations that exist today.
BTW, I looked at your Isotria medeoloides and Platanthera peramoena videos today. Nice to see both thriving. I was a bit surprised to see double flowers on the Isotria - I'm guessing this must be a fairly common thing since I've seen more than one photo of plants with double flowers. Of the hundreds of I. verticillata I've seen, a can't remember seeing one with double flowers, but then again my memory ain't what it used to be!
Similar threads
