I am sympathetic to your cause but....
The problem is that you did not have the export certificate from the AU agency identifying the plants as hybrids. Just because they have industrial printed tags does not mean they are actually what the tag says. How many smugglers change the labels and try to export orchids......many. It is common knowledge that the inspectors don't know diddly about orchid id so they must rely on paperwork, unfortunately for you you did not have any for them.
(snap)
You have just defined "acceptable" 21st century journalism.
Actually, the industrial printed tags were part of the pot, and the plant was rooted in the pot, so that could be a good indication of what they are, but you are right...
The problem being that they are said to be 'Australian Native Orchids', which means that the people who wrote the news report identified them as Australian Native Orchids... that's where their screw up is, because they are obviously Cattleya. When people don't know, they can speak about 'orchids', and finish. Those plants are orchids, if no one knows the proper identification, they remain as orchids. Stating 'Australian Native' is just to make the matter important, and get a nice thing to put online on their news website...
As for smuggling, indeed, but in most cases the plants pass with the proper name, and the proper CITES permit, just they have that cute 'A' appended on the CITES. That's a key point, most really smuggled orchids are smuggled... with the proper permits, except the real source ( wild instead of artificially propagated...). In this CITES is highly inefficient to serve its real purpose.
Journalism, indeed, but not only 21st Century. Beginning of the 20th Century, people started the 1st World War because of some journalists who reported tampered breaking news. We got, thanks to that and them too, the 2nd World War, with 'a few' casualties' if your unit is millions. The problem is a total lack of ethics in reporting the news. One time, I went to a Middle East country for 3 weeks, spent time there, discussed with the people, including some officials, very high rank, Muslims. No problem, and it was interesting. Interesting too that gays are absolutely accepted, as a kind of mistake, but the Ayatollah declared that, because there is a hope that they are real women with a medical problem, they must be accepted as gays. I have seen quite a few openly gay people during my stay. In regard to Islam, to protect them from attacks by ignorant people, they are just said to be a slight medical mistake, that can be corrected by surgery shall they wish... ( stupid according to our westerner standards, and definitely unacceptable, but in a hardcore Islamic country, to keep up with their belief, it is not so bad, the law is unacceptable, but the result is that gays and lesbians are free to do whatever they want, to some extent, in the streets or wherever...). That's a hardcore, Islamic country, that is quoted as bad and primitive by the journalists ( and believe it too, their scientist, including in agriculture, do not have to be envious of Europe or the USA...).
In a more 'tolerant' country, they got the diameter of their ******* checked, in Lebanon, to assess whether they are gays or not, which is one of the most disgusting things I have ever heard. Yet Lebanon is said to be a nice country by the journalists...
When I came back to France, journalists all over the world reported about 2 of those people I met, they refuse any foreigner, any Christian, they are assholes, they do not talk, they are primitive ( go for it, they spoke perfect French and knew a lot about our history ! And it was not a former French colony, far from it), the mass murders in the streets, the unveiled women that were beaten in that specific city ( they should have rented couple hundreds people to beat all the unveiled ones I have seen there, and it was not 'scheduled' by the authorities, I walked sometimes very far alone, and could see their real life...).
The same applies more recently to the 'resistance' in one country at war now, some are actual opponents, very few. The others are Middle Age Neanderthal people that the media push as 'victims' and 'good guys', like for many countries in the Arab Spring, but they are just so primitive that we do not want them anywhere, They want to allow only one book, the original Quaran, not even the Hadith or the commentaries by later islamic authorities, and ban music, as 'the only music acceptable is the recitation of the Quaran'.
I have been there, met them. Journalist were happy too with the 'Arab Spring' that see women as a support for the men, with not too many rights, or the millions of tons of mass destruction weapons of Saddam Hussein farce, that in fact turned a corrupt, dictatorial country in a law less rogue country, with real bad guys ( though good 'opponents') there now.
Anyway, back to orchids and after that rambling.