St. Swithin?

[Trithor]

A first flowering, not great, but still attractive

 

[labskaus]

Well, it looks quite unusual to me for a St. Swithin but pretty nice for a Bel Royal.

 

[Lmpgs]

Lovely!!

 

[Trithor]

I agree, it is standing next to a Bel Royal on my bench, and the two are nearly the same. I posted as per the label, but also believe it to be BR and not SW.

 

[Ozpaph]

Another great Bel Royal!

 

[polyantha]

Definitely Bel Royal. Congrats!

 

[TyroneGenade]

Yeah, not even if laevigatum was one of the parents could you claim phil influence: http://www.slippertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21130 (roth x laevigatum).

 

[eggshells]

Very nice.

 

[troy]

Ditto!!!

 

[Migrant13]

Both great and attractive I would say.

 

[Camellkc]

From the color of the pouch and petals, I would not consider it as Saint Swithin but a bel royal.

 

[troy]

I enjoy looking at it, it's bloomed very nicely, the way to find out what it is would be the inflourescence and the vegetation, I would say bel royal

 

[Spaph]

Great blooming, looking like some kolo in there to me!

 

[SlipperFan]

Pretty nice flower!

 

[AdamD]

Another killer Bel Royal. Very nice

 

[John M]

I'd say it's a very nice Bel Royal. Beautiful!

 

[abax]

I haven't a clue which plant it might be, but it's pretty anyway.

 

[atlantis]

I bet for a really nice Bel Royal too.

 

[SlipperKing]

An ugly St Swithin but one of your best BR dude!:wink:

 

[Trithor]

Thanks all, I purchased 3 plants of St Swithin, 3 Bel Royal, and 3 roths as a single import some years ago. According to my records they arrived a bit jumbled. The plant is a bit massive to be a St S.