SlipperKing
Madd Virologist
As great as this discussion has gone, unfortunately I must inject another couple of PICs




The petal length is right at 21 inches shorter then the first blooming. I didn't record the length on the tag but it seems they were in the mid 20'sAbsolutely incredible Rick. I wish I could see it in person. Fantastic plant too. Looks like you will be seeing flowers regularly from now on.
I could see why Tom was questioning it early on, but once the flowers have fully developed it just looks like a typical sanderianum to my eyes.
What did the petal length end up at?
The photography was great until post 88.
I did not know they could take so much water.
Great plant.
So I made it down to the Elizabeth Miller Horticulture Library last night prior to our meeting and looked up "The unique pollination mechanisms of Paphiopedilum sanderianum (Rchb. f) Stein [1990]
Kramer, R.D."
Epic over searching for nothing... essentially in the article he hypothesizes that the long petals of sanderianum are for ants to access, but he has noted zero observations of such an act. He also theorizes that ants or flies are attracted to the nectar she produces, but again no observations nor proof.
"Expectation is premeditated disappointment." - Sogyal Rinpoche
We need some one to go sit in the jungle of Borneo and just watch a sandie day in, day out. Volunteers??
Cheers
JAB
We need some one to go sit in the jungle of Borneo and just watch a sandie day in, day out. Volunteers??
Cheers
JAB