C. trianaei ‘Cashen’s’ Original Division

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I’ve bloomed the one from Orchids Ltd. last Sept., they labeled the cross 4N on the tag. Here is a link to their description Cattleya Louis Chaton (4N) (Syn. C. Adela) (percivaliana 'Mendenhall Summit' AM/AOS (4N) x trianaei 'Cashens' FCC/AOS (4N))

I’ve not bloomed the Waldor one as it was small, might bloom this year. You bring up a good point. I guess I assumed with this one that because both parents are 4N, it would be too. Is that not correct?
Here is the link to their listing.
https://www.waldor.com/products/c-l...-x-trianaei-cashens-fcc-aos-1898-remake-4-pot
Tetraploid parents do NOT guarantee tetraploid offspring. It is very likely though.
-Patrick
 
Yes, whenever pollen grows down into the plant ovary a genetic lottery occurs. Even a self crossing of a plant has a chance of producing a plant with a mutation or even some extra chromosomes. Mericloning avoids some, but not all, of the genetic adventure. I have selfing crosses of both trianae ‘Cashen’s’ and percivaliana ‘Summit’ and they are each different from the wonderful divisions that southernbelle has. I would have preferred a mericlone of ‘Cashen’s’ and ‘Summit’ but I was not able to find one years ago when I was looking. So, if you really love a particular Cattleya the pecking order should be (1) a virus-free division of the original plant, (2) a virus-free mericlone of an original plant, and (3) a selfing cross of an original plant. If a virus infected plant is self crossed with meticulous technique throughout the whole process, it is possible to end up with a virus free seedling, but it is likely to be at least a little different from the original parent and I would probably test for virus for several years of growth.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top