Pale leaves with green veining

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If you are open-minded enough and wiling to take definitions to extreme, one might consider all orchid growing to by hydroponic in nature, or nearly so, as for the most part, the substrate primarily provides mechanical stability and temporary moisture storage while the nutrition comes from the applied solutions.
 
I am learning so much from reading this thread. I want to go back to school and study water chemistry.

Sounds like you’re on the right track. Just remember as long as paphs have good moisture they don’t tend to spontaneously die so keep perfecting things but don’t let it freak you out if you’re not 100% right
Thank you for the words of encouragement. I got my first two paphs one year ago this month and am feeling a bit frustrated with what seems like my shallow learning curve. On the other hand, I am finding the challenge highly entertaining.

When a plant absorbs a negatively-charged nitrate ion, it must secrete another negative ion to compensate. Ammonium ion absorption (+) results in a positive ion secretion.

The untreated rockwool has a high pH, indicating the presence of excessive negative ions. If the plant must secrete negative ions, the substrate chemistry will “fight against it” as the plant is trying to add to the negative ion concentration, and nature “hates” imbalances. That resistance can stifle the natural processes within the plant, potentially causing issues. If, on the other hand, the plant, due to it being fed with positively-charged ammonium ions, must emit positive ions to compensate, the substrate will favor the absorption, supporting the plant’s efforts.
This is a beautifully clear explanation of how nitrates and NH3's and 4's (is there a difference between these?-aside from the additional atom) move through the plant and substrate. Thank you.

N is usually provided as around 95% Calcium nitrate/potassium nitrate with the remainder being ammonium. This is due to the lack of CEC of most hydroponic substrates (leca being one) and eliminates the possibility of ammonium toxicity.
I really should quote everyone here. I think I need to experiment with different fertilizer solutions to see which form of N is preferable. Peter's is not high in NH3-4. However, about half of the N in my solution has been coming from additional urea, which when broken down by microbes becomes ammonium and carbon dioxide-I think. I shouldn't have high microbial action in leca but I have been using quantum. So possibly ammonium toxicity?

With coarse leca I cover the surface with moss to reduce evaporation and provide a moist layer to accommodate new surface roots.
I am now moving beyond the nutrient deficiency question but if you have the time, could you talk a bit more about the moss? How do you introduce it to your pots? I am assuming that it survives on the surface because of your frequent watering? I do feel that the surface of my pots is dry and I worry about new root growth. But my N is really too small to comment.
 
If you are open-minded enough and wiling to take definitions to extreme, one might consider all orchid growing to by hydroponic in nature, or nearly so, as for the most part, the substrate primarily provides mechanical stability and temporary moisture storage while the nutrition comes from the applied solutions.
Works for me. Even in nature the nutrients are transported by water.
 
I am now moving beyond the nutrient deficiency question but if you have the time, could you talk a bit more about the moss? How do you introduce it to your pots? I am assuming that it survives on the surface because of your frequent watering? I do feel that the surface of my pots is dry and I worry about new root growth. But my N is really too small to comment.
If you keep the surface moist enough some type of moss usually will start on its own. But that takes to long. So I add a layer of sphagnum moss to fill the roll of living moss. Pack the moss firmly into contact with the substrate.
1000006195.jpg
I use Peruvian sphagnum moss because I know it is hand collected moss species that orchids are growing. But most importantly it has been sun dried and still retains some ability to regrow along with the common volunteer moss. Sphagnum moss grows less dense than the common moss but roots grow well through both.
1000006205.jpg
That root was completely covered in moss. I exposed it for the photo.
1000006196.jpg
The original miss will slowly decompose but as it doesn't moss should start to grow. If it doesn't you can add a new layer to continue the benefits.
1000006198.jpg
Common moss on the right and Peruvian sphagnum on the left.
1000006208.jpg
Sphagnum producing spoors. Once you have the moss established it's easy to transplant it into other pots.
1000006203.jpg
Common moss spooring.
 

Attachments

  • 1000006208.jpg
    1000006208.jpg
    3.4 MB
Last edited:
If you keep the surface moist enough some type of moss usually will start on its own. But that takes to long. So I add a layer of sphagnum moss to fill the roll of living moss. Pack the moss firmly into contact with the substrate.
View attachment 52036
I use Peruvian sphagnum moss because I know it is hand collected moss species that orchids are growing. But most importantly it has been sun dried and still retains some ability to regrow along with the common volunteer moss. Sphagnum moss grows less dense than the common moss but roots grow well through both.
View attachment 52037
That root was completely covered in moss. I exposed it for the photo.
View attachment 52038
The original miss will slowly decompose but as it doesn't moss should start to grow. If it doesn't you can add a new layer to continue the benefits.
View attachment 52039
Common moss on the right and Peruvian sphagnum on the left.
View attachment 52042
Sphagnum producing spoors. Once you have the moss established it's easy to transplant it into other pots.
View attachment 52040
Common moss spooring.
Adds extra life to it all. I like it a lot.
 
If you are open-minded enough and wiling to take definitions to extreme, one might consider all orchid growing to by hydroponic in nature, or nearly so, as for the most part, the substrate primarily provides mechanical stability and temporary moisture storage while the nutrition comes from the applied solutions.
Not really.
Most orchids apart from the ''true epiphytes'' such as Phalaenopsis or Vanda, rely on the nutrient bank in humus which has built up over the eons. That is not to say they can't be grown really well hydroponically. They certainly can. I remember espice's bellatulum.
But ones in nature which happen to germinate in rather barren places always look like they're struggling compared to their neighbours in better positions.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/175894275
 
Back
Top