D
Darin
Guest
A first bloom seedling that I got from SVO. 2 growths with 2 inflorescences. Been open since November 3rd and still looks pretty good.
Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!Very nice!
I agree. Very nice.
D
Darin
Guest
Took it for judging when it had first opened. Color and form were noted as being very nice but it was a bit smaller than recently awarded clones. I figure a bit more growth and maturity and it may be an awardable plant.
Great flowers! :clap:
SlipperKing
Madd Virologist
Yes, great flowers!
Nice "seedling"!! 
oke:
oke:
emydura
Well-Known Member
Very nice indeed.
luvsorchids
Well-Known Member
:drool::drool::clap::clap: One of my favorites. Yes, fairrie nice .
Susan
.Susan
SlipperFan
Addicted
All the above!
G
goldenrose
Guest
:drool::drool:Quite nice!!!
P
Paph_LdyMacBeth
Guest
Beautiful! What a future it has!
Yes clearly this is one of the better ones. Great form, especially the dorsal.
C
Chuck
Guest
A very nice example of one of my favourite paph species.
JeanLux
Well-Known Member
Beuties!!!! And a great plant: 2 spikes for a first bloomer :clap: !!!! Jean
Superb flowers - well shaped and colourated - a feast for the eyes !!
N
nikv
Guest
I love this species but I just cannot seem to keep them alive. Funny though, i have several plants that are primary crosses to the Maudiae group and also a couple of Paph. Angela's (farrieanum x niveum) that I find quite easy to grow!
John M
Orchid Addict
This is a beautiful clone. Congrats!
Too bad about being turned down at the judging. I'm surprised that it was a size issue that prevented it from being pointed. Isn't size supposed to be just 10% of the total point score for a Paph? ....And if so, then in theory, you could submit a Paph fairrieanum with a 100% perfectly formed and coloured flower with a NS of just 1" and it should still get a 90 point FCC! So, if everything else was superior, why wouldn't they point this one, even if it was "a bit smaller than recently awarded clones"?
Too bad about being turned down at the judging. I'm surprised that it was a size issue that prevented it from being pointed. Isn't size supposed to be just 10% of the total point score for a Paph? ....And if so, then in theory, you could submit a Paph fairrieanum with a 100% perfectly formed and coloured flower with a NS of just 1" and it should still get a 90 point FCC! So, if everything else was superior, why wouldn't they point this one, even if it was "a bit smaller than recently awarded clones"?
Last edited:
