Nice, interesting lawrenceanum. The dorsal does not look fully expanded yet, if it is, the plant has a small dorsal for lawrenceanum. The color is really good, almost too good, the distribution of color being a lot like the "flame" pattern of some vinicolors type breeding. The spotting is not typical, usually spots only on petal edges, but the tall stem and leaf patterns look pretty much right.
Without seeing the plant in person, my comments that follow are more speculation than not, so I am not recommending you change your tags based on my comments. Rather I suggest you investigate what you can of the provenance of your plant. I am not certain it is pure lawrenceanum, possibly it could be Alma Gevaert (lawrencianum x Maudiae), or Eleanor Rozilla (Alma Gevaert x lawrenceanum), but since neither hybrid in the coloratum form is very common in North America anymore, those two suggestions might not be right. It could be a coloratum form of (Macabre x lawrenceanum) or some other Maudiae type hybrid like Hsinying Larry (lawrenceanum x Ruby Leopard) with some sukhakulii and or some callosum 'Jac type' vinicolor in it. If it is a hybrid it strongly favors the lawrenceanum parent.
But I am not certain. Species do have natural inherent variability. Your plant is not far out enough to be certain it is not the species. If you are not using it as a seed parent for hybrids, I wouldn't worry too much, and just show it as lawrenceanum. If you were using it as part of a "gene bank" ex situ conservation program, I would hesitate to use it as a breeding parent for more of the 'true' species, Paph lawrenceanum.
But did I say it is an attractive flower, nicely grown and beautifully photographed? Good growing on your part. Thanks for sharing a thought provoking plant.
