eOrchids
Well-Known Member
Very cool!
Interesting little species!
Interesting little species!
Thank you Roland and Olaf for all the help.
That one still needs to be determined. At first, it looks like a parvi because of the leaves and petals but not quite when you look at the pouch.
Also this species is unique having four pollinias. (We thought that was a single plant anomaly but looking into the other clones, there are four) I can't recall any Paphiopedilum that displays this characteristics.
You would have thought something as radically different as having 4 pollinia would be in the taxonomic description. However the authors say 2 pollinia. Why the difference?
Thank you very much for additional photos, eggshells! Any other behind-the-stage stories which you can share? Who are in the other competing party to describe this species? Polymorphic number of pollinia is interesting. In phal taxonomy, they used to make big deal out of it, but I think it is not such a constrained trait (I believe that it evolved multiple times if I remember it correctly).
It was caught late and never made it to the internet publication. However, it will be updated on the printed journal. I have just been told in fact that some flowers of some hybrids do this which start with 4 pollinia two on both sides. And as the flower ages, it returns to normal so we will see. Regardless, I will let you guys know.