paphioland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2006
- Messages
- 1,457
- Reaction score
- 14
Yes you're right but don't forget the potential genetic. MM proved to have a fantastic one.
Tarantula is MM x Val and in my opinion, the problem is Val in its genetic potential.
Tarantula is awesome but not sure it will be fantastic as parent.
In my opinion, I prefer to cross Tarantula with MM than to cross Tarantula with another "MM x Val" like Raptor or Perfection for example.
And to be honest, I prefer the roth. crosses with 2 parents from 2 differents breeding lines. For example "MM x Val" x "Green Valley x Dou Fong" or yet "MM x Val" x "MM x Rex" or even "MM x Val" x "Reachout x self"
Just my opinion.
Because I have a last question. How many awarded plants (or potentially awarded) from "MM x Val" for how many bloomed? To know the percentage would be very interesting.
Id much rather have tarantula outcrossed to some other genetics. MM is always there. You already got the best of MM in the parent flowers, probably mm is the backround of the outcross as well. Why go back and get the bad parts of MM? MM wasn't that spectacular compared to modern roths. Id go back to tarantula just because nothing has come close to it.
I have bloomed out multiple Tarantula offspring. It will be a good parent. The best two roths I bloomed last year had tarantula as a parent. I already put a pod on it.