I'm more than happy to be wrong, but this appears to be mislabeled.
It's obviously a nice multifloral either way.
For what it's worth (maybe a US nickel), I'm getting some kolopakingii vibes from the muted color as well as the wide, chunky looking leaves. So it makes me wonder if that species is involved in the ancestry somewhere.
OK, I'll stop playing dumb
My first guess when it began opening was Kolosand, but given the petals are not extending any more, this is not it. My second guess was a Temptation (kolopagingii x philipinensis) but most pictures I find online have more twisty petals. I was also seeing the kolo influence.
In the end, it might be a more greenish Saint Swithin? The flower is quite big which is a plus, but yet, what a deception it was for me to flower something completely different than what I purchased. I was looking forward to a next-gen Roth there !
Cheers,
Mathieu
Bel Royal?OK, I'll stop playing dumb
My first guess when it began opening was Kolosand, but given the petals are not extending any more, this is not it. My second guess was a Temptation (kolopagingii x philipinensis) but most pictures I find online have more twisty petals. I was also seeing the kolo influence.
In the end, it might be a more greenish Saint Swithin? The flower is quite big which is a plus, but yet, what a deception it was for me to flower something completely different than what I purchased. I was looking forward to a next-gen Roth there !
Cheers,
Mathieu
I doubt that...Bel Royal flowers are very different...Bel Royal?
emyduraLol, which one of you is David?
Lol, which one of you is David?
Enter your email address to join: