The issue of Decker's Paph gigantifolium has been changed since last fall at the JC Meeting. As long as documentation can be provided that the parent was from his origin, the awards will be honored in the future.
The primary worry from the AOS perspective is that while judging plants of questionable legality (or their hybrids), judges take temporary ownership of the plants and could be legally in jeopardy as a result. I personally disagree with that conjecture, but would not like to find out the hard way.
This must be an issue of State law since what constitutes possession from a legal standpoint can vary. I discussed this issue in the thread about Judging that I started. I'd be curious to discuss this with the lawyer who stated that was the case.
Also, it seems that AOS is going to work with those of us that have had his plants and our awards nullified. To me, on top of Orchids Magazine, makes membership 100% worthwhile!