It is called excuse. You want to make money, you have to work for it.
I don't think you follow as usual. But let me try again one last time, into details.
Why do you have to throw in the "as usual" part?
You don't have to take pictures of every plant you sell and no one does that.
You don't even have to use pictures of your own stock.
Just one representative picture for each group will do.
I thought you said anyone who bought a previously flowered plant without seeing a photo first was a fool. That would mean you need photos of every previously flowered plant if you hope to sell them out of flower.
For plants that cost hundreds of dollars and more, usually division or previously flowered plants, you must have pictures of the flowers of those plants being sold.
I follow that and agree with it but the thread is about a low quality plant so I had no way to know you were limiting your photo requirement to high dollar plants.
Now let me explain something that you dont follow... The orchid industry functioned for decades with photos of individual plants offered by growers. Now that the internet and didital images are common it is expected. BUT in previous years a grower such as OZ would never need a photo to prove quality of an out of flower plant, their word was good enough, that was what a reputation was good for and that is the reputation Terry Root earned for OZ. But that is Terry's reputation and whether the new owners can maintain the reputation will be seen in the future.
Are you saying you have hundreds of these top quality orchids that you have hard time photographing? I highly doubt it.
No one does.