- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 4,042
- Reaction score
- 4,938
The plant, staminode and the dorsal markings all indicate this is a true lunatum...it is different than the photo that you linked...it is not purpurascent for sure.Nice plant, but not a lunatum. I think it is purpurascens...
https://www.paphs.de/en/blog/paph-lunatum-no-its-paph-purpurascens-2
You might be right...when I look closely, the markings on the staminode are suspicious and the pouch shape is questionable too...but I don't think it is 100% virens or purpurascens either. A profile photo might clear some of the questions...just my opinion.This is the true lunatum....
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/240-lunatum
@Tom-DE: I know the parent plants of this purpurascens and where the young plants were raised - even if it is not recognized by most taxonomists.... they call it javanicum or virens
https://www.paphs.de/en/blog/javanicum
and here purpurascens:
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/262-purpurascens
or virens:
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/303-virens
Enter your email address to join: