- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 4,046
- Reaction score
- 4,944
The plant, staminode and the dorsal markings all indicate this is a true lunatum...it is different than the photo that you linked...it is not purpurascent for sure.Nice plant, but not a lunatum. I think it is purpurascens...
https://www.paphs.de/en/blog/paph-lunatum-no-its-paph-purpurascens-2
You might be right...when I look closely, the markings on the staminode are suspicious and the pouch shape is questionable too...but I don't think it is 100% virens or purpurascens either. A profile photo might clear some of the questions...just my opinion.This is the true lunatum....
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/240-lunatum
@Tom-DE: I know the parent plants of this purpurascens and where the young plants were raised - even if it is not recognized by most taxonomists.... they call it javanicum or virens
https://www.paphs.de/en/blog/javanicum
and here purpurascens:
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/262-purpurascens
or virens:
https://www.paphs.de/en/species/303-virens
I think so.It’s a very nice flower but these all look like javanicum to me. Of course I understand if they have different origins but it’s what I’m seeing.
Beautiful. I think my javanicum originated with you? Of course I see differences here but there’s also a lot of similarity.for javanicum I have this...
They are very similar...P. javanicum is legal here in the U.S. but I am not sure about lunatum (pretty sure it isn't legal here yet since it is so new, but most likely it is in cultivation now here unintentionally illegally because of the similarity).Beautiful. I think my javanicum originated with you? Of course I see differences here but there’s also a lot of similarity.
This is for me the purpurascens and not a virens.for javanicum I have this...
Enter your email address to join: