Phrag besseae 'Lovebug'

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Next will be a bessae with overlapping petals
Carsten

This just in...stay tuned for updates.

besseae_Maximizer_-_1.jpg


Phrag besseae 'Maximizer' from OZ

Regards,
Rick
 
OK, ok Yay besseae!!! [Now sneak me a few, hide them in your pockets and ship to NYC. :ninja: You want there to be some remnants left when the San Andreas fault makes Pheonix waterfront property, right? :poke:]
 
Both are truly amazing! Just for fun, could someone post a pic of a 'regular' besseae to see the difference?
 
all the modern OZ bess are 2n. Even the famous Jason Fischer 'Triplicate' is
2n. It is an understandable common misconception that it is 3n.

Are you sure on this? I was told he used 'Terry's Choice' to make it, which is a 4N.

By the way, you should put Memoria Dick Clements on that besseae ;). Nice flower!
 
Are you sure on this? I was told he used 'Terry's Choice' to make it, which is a 4N.

By the way, you should put Memoria Dick Clements on that besseae ;). Nice flower!

Hey Jason.

Who told you that it was 3N? I also thought this because of the name but that referred to the the flower count.

You might be biased concerning cross ideas lol:wink:
 
I share the same thought as Dot. How does one come up with this judging from a picture? :confused: Please share with us how you arrived at this number.

I think the comment was a sarcastic one. When it comes to paphs and phrags, as a whole, there is much work that needs to be done in terms of awarding and judging. It is pretty unreliable. I personally place almost no value in an award except to look up the measurements of the flower because I can't trust if the award is "valid" or not. I am not dissing all the judges. Some know paphs well most do not. There are good ones out there but on a whole the system is lacking. There should prob be a group that just judges paphs and phrags. That would be ideal but prob not enough interest to make it convenient.
 
True, but you have to give the judges credit - look at the thousands of species and hybrids they have to be 'experts' on! (orchids in general, not just slippers). I too think that there are many injustices done at the judging table, and it probably would be a good idea to have specialists in different Alliances, but not really practical.
 
The only way you all can help is to rush out to your local (or not so local, but closest) judging center and get involved. And not by taking a plant once in a while, but sitting in for a couple months, clerking some shows, then applying to be a student.

-Ernie
 
The only way you all can help is to rush out to your local (or not so local, but closest) judging center and get involved. And not by taking a plant once in a while, but sitting in for a couple months, clerking some shows, then applying to be a student.

-Ernie

Exactly!!! Just like Dog show judges not only an expert on one breed but all breeds.


Ramon:)
 
The only way you all can help is to rush out to your local (or not so local, but closest) judging center and get involved. And not by taking a plant once in a while, but sitting in for a couple months, clerking some shows, then applying to be a student.

-Ernie

It might be nice to be a judge. I have clerked, and sat in on AOS judging many times, but apply to be a student? Not unless I win the lottery to be able to fly to Vancouver or Toronto once a month, plus judge at other shows. I hear AOS judging doesn't pay much either.:poke:
 
Exactly!!! Just like Dog show judges not only an expert on one breed but all breeds.


Ramon:)

True, if you are an AOS judge, you should be an expert on all genera, but that obviously isn't the case. On top of that, there is personal bias in judging which I don't think should be allowed. Judges should judge based on what they have learned only. Why do some plants get passed over by one judging team, then awarded by another? That doesn't seem fair.
 
Back
Top